Murshidabad Unrest: Unveiling the Communal Violence, Targeted Attacks on Hindus, and the Trauma of Women in West Bengal
ai generated real one is not allowed

SIT Report
"The Islamists have burnt all the clothes in the house with the kerosene oil and the woman of the house had no clothes to cover her body."
The Spark: Protests Turn Violent
The unrest ignited between April 8 and April 13, 2025, sparked by demonstrations against the Waqf (Amendment) Act, 2025. Protesters voiced concerns that the new law would negatively impact property rights and religious institutions.
Fatalities3 (Hargobind Das, Chandan Das, Izaz Ahmed Sheikh)
Injuries Over 10 individualsDisplaced IndividualsOver 400 people (including women and children);
specifically 87 families / 345 individuals
individuals; some reports indicate over 307FIRs
Lodged60 First Information Reports; some reports indicate over 122
However, these protests rapidly escalated beyond peaceful dissent. On April 8, National Highway 12 at Umarpur was blocked, police vehicles were set on fire, and train services were disrupted at Nimtita railway station, with stones pelted at a stationary train.
In an attempt to regain control, the West Bengal government deployed additional police and temporarily suspended internet services in parts of the district to prevent the spread of misinformation. Section 144, which restricts public gatherings, was also imposed.
Targeted Attacks: A Pattern of Premeditation
Multiple investigations and reports strongly indicate that the Murshidabad violence was not random but a series of targeted acts. A fact-finding team concluded the violence was "orchestrated as well as targeted communities."
The human cost was tragic, with at least three fatalities. On April 12, Hargobind Das and his son Chandan Das were brutally killed when a mob attacked their home. According to a Special Investigation Team (SIT) report, "The Islamists broke down the main door, dragged out Chandan Das and Hargobind Das, and struck them with an axe in the back; a man reportedly stood guard until they died."
Property destruction was extensive: a police report detailed 88 fully damaged houses, 162 partly damaged, 53 fully destroyed shops, and 64 partly damaged. In total, 1320 people were directly affected, and 87 families (345 individuals) were displaced.
Investigations have pointed to the alleged involvement of radical elements. Banned groups like the Popular Front of India (PFI) and Students Islamic Movement of India (SIMI) reportedly reactivated their networks, exploiting existing tensions.
The alleged involvement of political figures, such as Rajesh Sheikh, with ties to radical groups, suggests a dangerous link between local politics and extremist mobilization, potentially hindering law enforcement.
The Plight of Hindu Women: Molestation, Displacement, and Trauma
The impact on women during the Murshidabad violence was particularly severe, with disturbing accounts of gender-based violence and trauma. The SIT report noted a particularly egregious incident: "The Islamists have burnt all the clothes in the house with the kerosene oil and the woman of the house had no clothes to cover her body."
The National Commission for Women (NCW) took official notice of "reports of several women enduring molestation during communal unrest in the Mandirpara area." An NCW inquiry committee, led by Chairperson Vijaya Rahatkar, visited the affected areas and relief camps in neighboring Malda district.
During their visit, NCW members reported encountering numerous women, children, and families who "endured unimaginable suffering, leaving an indelible emotional impact."
The psychological impact was profound, with the NCW highlighting the "profound trauma inflicted on the victims, particularly the women, leaving 'deep scars' on their psyches."
Displaced women faced heightened vulnerability and loss of dignity, worsened by the alleged absence of adequate state support.
Disturbingly, allegations of police harassment emerged from the Para Lalpur camp, with women claiming police visited at night, instructing them not to communicate with outsiders, and even removing cooks, making it difficult to access food.
Official Response and Allegations of Failure
The West Bengal government initially deployed police and suspended internet services. Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee appealed for calm and stated the Waqf (Amendment) Act would not be implemented in West Bengal.
However, the Calcutta High Court intervened due to perceived inadequate state actions. On April 12, the High Court ordered the deployment of central paramilitary forces (CAPF) to restore order.
Multiple reports highlighted significant police lapses. A police damage report indicated "mismanaged" deployment, allowing mobs to "attack and loot freely."
The NCW issued a scathing report, alleging a "complete breakdown" of administrative machinery and governance in Murshidabad.
Allegations of political complicity also surfaced. Opposition leaders from the BJP claimed ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC) leaders incited violence and that state police failed to intervene due to "immense affection towards the fundamentalists." The High Court report also mentioned a TMC leader's presence during the violence. West Bengal Governor C. V. Ananda Bose raised concerns about "rising radicalisation and communal instability" in a report to the Union Ministry of Home Affairs.
Political Blame Game: Accusations and Counter-Accusations
The Murshidabad violence quickly became a political battleground. BJP leaders, including Suvendu Adhikari and Sukanta Majumdar, condemned the violence as a "premeditated act" by "extremist elements" and "jihadist forces," accusing the Mamata Banerjee government of "cruelty" towards Hindus.
Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee condemned the violence and appealed for peace, but accused the BJP-led central government and the Border Security Force (BSF) of instigating communal violence.
Humanitarian Crisis and the Road to Rehabilitation
The violence displaced over 400 people, including women and children, who fled to neighboring Malda district, often sheltering in schools.
While local authorities in Malda provided some initial relief
The Calcutta High Court mandated comprehensive rehabilitation, forming a committee to identify displaced individuals, assess property damage, and collect FIR data.
Murshidabad's Complex Tapestry: Demographics and Underlying Tensions
Murshidabad is a densely populated district with a Muslim majority (66.27%) and a significant Hindu minority (33.21%) as per the 2011 census. Historically, the district has faced socio-economic disparities, with Muslims often being tenants under predominantly Hindu landlords, contributing to underlying communal tensions.
The district's porous border with Bangladesh introduces complex cross-border dynamics, with concerns about illegal migration and the spread of radical ideologies.
The alleged presence and reactivation of Bangladesh-based extremist modules like JMB and ABT, collaborating with local operatives and banned Indian groups like PFI and SIMI, are highlighted as significant factors fueling unrest and radicalizing youth.
Conclusion: Seeking Justice and Sustainable Peace
The April 2025 Murshidabad violence represents a profound scar on West Bengal's social fabric, leaving behind death, injury, widespread destruction, and deep psychological trauma, especially for women and children.
The ongoing legal proceedings and charge sheets against accused individuals are crucial steps towards justice. Comprehensive and sensitive rehabilitation efforts, as mandated by the Calcutta High Court, are essential for victims to rebuild their lives and ensure their safe return.
The Murshidabad incident serves as a stark reminder of the fragility of communal harmony in border regions and the critical importance of effective governance, robust law enforcement, and inclusive development to prevent such tragedies from recurring. A coordinated approach between state and central authorities, coupled with genuine community engagement, is vital for fostering long-term stability and ensuring justice for all affected.
Wow good job
ReplyDelete